Revision del proceso de la administracion estrategica, estudio del paradigma de estrategia, estructura y equifinalidad: una investigacion empirica en empresas en noreste de México

H Aguirre; O Flores; V F Alatorre

doi:10.29105/rinn2.3-4

Autores/as

H Aguirre Autonomous University of Tamaulipas
O Flores Autonomous University of Tamaulipas
V F Alatorre Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn2.3-4

Palabras clave:

Caos, Estrategia, Estructura, Equifinalidad, Situacional, Sistemas

Resumen

Esta investigación busca comprobar empíricamente el paradigma entre estrategiaestructura y equifinalidad en empresas del noreste de México. Se llevó al cabo un estudio a través de la aplicación de cuestionarios a negocios de esa parte del país. Se consideró como variable independiente la existencia del modelo de Chandler acerca de que la “estructura organizacional sigue a la estrategia”. La variable dependiente, se establece como la obtención de resultados equifinales (igualmente finales), con o sin la existencia del paradigma de estrategia-estructura. Dos contribuciones emergen de este estudio. La primera consiste en haber encontrado que efectivamente existe una relación entre estrategia y estructura en las empresas investigadas. La segunda, y más importante, es que se evidenció, con prueba empírica, el paradigma de equifinalidad. Se necesita mayor investigación para poder determinar las razones para el funcionamiento de este paradigma. La naturaleza holística de la Administración Estratégica puede ser la que explique el éxito final, “sin importar los inicios”.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Ashmos, D.P. y G.P. Huber. 1987. The Systems Paradigm in Organization Theory: Correcting the Record and Suggesting the Future. Academy of Management Review. 12: 607-621.

Bettis, R. A., y C. K. Prahalad. 1995. The dominant logic: Retrospective and Extension. Strategic Management Journal. 16: 5-14.

Burns, J. S. 2002. Chaos theory and leadership studies: Exploring uncharted seas. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. Flint Fall. 9(I2): 42.

Burns, T. y G. M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London. Tavistock Publications.

Certo, S.C. 2001. Administración Moderna, 8a. ed. Bogotá, Colombia: Pearson Educación de Colombia Ltda.

Chandler, A.D., Jr. 1962. Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, M.A. MIT Press.

Chennai, B. 2003. Of Chaos and Complexity. Businessline: 1.

DeGrauwe, P., H. Dewatcher y M. Embrects. 1993. Exchange rate theory: chaotic models of foreign exchange markets. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

Deshpande, R. y J.U. Farley. 1998. Measuring Market Orientation: A Generalization and Synthesis. Journal of Market Focused Management 2: 213-232.

Dessler, G. 1979. Organización y Administración: Un Enfoque Situacional. Cali, Colombia. Prentice-Hall International.

Dill, W.R. 1958. Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy. Administrative Science Quarterly 2: 409-443.

Doty, D.H., W.H. Glick y G.P. Huber. 1993. Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories. Academy of Management Journal 36: 1196-1250.

Drago, A.W., 1998. Mintzberg’s Pentagon and Organisation Positioning. Management Research News 21(4/5): 30.

Galbraith, J.R. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, M.A. Addison-Wesley.

Gleick, J. 1987. Chaos Making a New Science. N.Y. Penguin Books.

Gutiérrez, S. R. 1992. Introducción a la Filosofía. México: Editorial Esfinge, S.A. de C.V.

Gresov, C. y R. Drazin. 1997. Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organizational Design. Academy of Management Review. 22: 403-438.

Gurpreet, D. yJ. Ward. 2002. Chaos Theory as a Framework for Studying Information Systems. Information Resources Management Journal. 15(2): 5-9 .

Hrebeniak, L., y W. Joyce. 1985. Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism. Administrative Science Quarterly. 30: 336-349.

Hopkins, T. 1937. Integration: Its Meaning and Application. N. Y. Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Jennings, D.F. y S.L. Seaman. 1994. "High and Low Levels of Organizational Adaptation: An Empirical Analysis of Strategy, Structure, and Performance." Strategic Management Journal 15: 459-475.

Johnson, G. y K. Scholes. 2001. Dirección Estratégica, 5a. Ed. Madrid, España: Pearson Educación S.A.

Katz, D. y R.L. Kahn. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. N.Y. John Wiley & Sons.

_______ 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. N.Y: John Wiley & Sons.

Kauffman, S. 1995. Laws of Self Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lawrence, P.R. y J.W. Lorsch. 1969. Organizations and Environments. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Lorsch, J.W. y J.J. Morse. 1974. Organizations and Their Members: A Contingency Approach. N.Y. Harper and Row.

Matsuno, K. y J.T. Mentzer. 2000. The Effects of Strategic Type on the Market OrientationPerformance Relationship. Journal of Marketing. 64: 1-16.

Meyer, A. D., A. S. Tsui y C. R. Hinings. 1993. Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis. Academy of Management Journal. 36: 1175-1195.

Miles, R.E. y C.C. Snow. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. N.Y. McGraw-Hill.

_____, _____, A.D. Meyer y H.J. Coleman Jr. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process. Academy of Management Review 12: 607-621.

Miller, D. 1987. The genesis of configuration. Journal of Management Studies. 12: 686-701.

Mintzberg, H. T. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. PrenticeHall.

_____ 1993. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Nadler, D. A., y M. L. Tushman. 1988. Strategic Organization Design. Glenwood, I.L. Scott.

Peters, E. 1991. Chaos And Order in Capital Markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. N.Y. Free Press.

Prichett, P. y R. Pound. 2001. The Stress of Organizational Change. Piano, Texas: Pritchett Rummler-Brache.

Pugh, D.S., D.J. Hickson, C.R. Hinnings y C. Turner. 1969. The Context of Organizational Structures. Administrative Science Quarterly. 14: 91-114.

Radzicki, M. J. 1990. Institutional Dynamics, Deterministic Chaos, and Self-organizing Systems. Journal of Economic Issues. 24,1,57-102.

Scott, W. R. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 3rd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, N.J. Prentice-Hall.

Stacey, R. D. 1991. The Chaos Frontier - Creative Strategic Control for Business, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

Stoner, J. A., F. R. E. Freeman y D. R. Gilbert, Jr. 1996. Administración. Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana, S. A.

Van de Ven, A.H. y R. Drazin. 1985. The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory. Research in Organizational Behavior, Eds B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings. Greenwich, C.T. JAI Press: 333-375.

Venkatraman, N. y J. E. Prescott. 1990. Environment-structure Coalignment: An Empirical Test of its Performance Implications. Strategic Management Journal. 11: 1-23.

Von Bertalanffy, L. 1930. Kritische Theorie der Formbildung. Vienna. Schaltz Publishing.

_____. 1960. General Systems Theory. New York, N.Y. George Braziller.

_____. 1968. General System Theory. New Cork, N.Y. Braziller.

Wechsler, J. 1998. Managed Care Firms are Kicking Butts. Managed Healthcare 8(4): 32-36.

www.cyberspace.com/~building/ofc_21clidhock.html Hock, D.W.

(1996), The Chaordic Organization: out of Control and Into Order.

http://www.deguate.com/infocentros/gerencia/glosario/a.htm

http://www.uned.es/master-seguros/consultas/consultas_2003-04.htm