Revisión del proceso de la administración estratégica, estudio del paradigma de estrategia, estructura y equifinalidad: Una investigación empírica en empresas del noreste de Mexico

H Aguirre; O. Flores; V. F. Alatorre

doi:10.29105/rinn5.10-8

Autores/as

H Aguirre Autonomous University of Tamaulipas
O. Flores Autonomous University of Tamaulipas
V. F. Alatorre Autonomous University of Tamaulipas

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn5.10-8

Palabras clave:

Sistemas, Situacional, Estrategia, Estructura, Equifinalidad, Caos

Resumen

Esta investigación busca comprobar empíricamente el paradigma entre estrategiaestructura y equifinalidad en empresas del noreste de México. Se llevó al cabo un estudio a través de la aplicación de cuestionarios a negocios de esa parte del país. Se consideró como variable independiente la existencia del modelo de Chandler acerca de que la “estructura organizacional sigue a la estrategia”. La variable dependiente, se establece como la obtención de resultados equifinales (igualmente finales), con o sin la existencia del paradigma de estrategia-estructura. Dos contribuciones emergen de este estudio. La primera consiste en haber encontrado que efectivamente existe una relación entre estrategia y estructura en las empresas investigadas. La segunda, y más importante, es que se evidenció, con prueba empírica, el paradigma de equifinalidad.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Métricas

Cargando métricas ...

Citas

Ashmos, D.P. y G.P. Huber. 1987. "The Systems Paradigm in Organization Theory: Correcting the Record and Suggesting the Future." Academy of Management Review 12: 607-621.

Bettis, R. A., y C. K. Prahalad. 1995. “The dominant logic: Retrospective and Extension”. Strategic Management Journal, 16: 5-14.

Burns, J. S. 2002. “Chaos theory and leadership studies: Exploring uncharted seas”. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies. Flint: Fall Vol. 9, Iss. 2; pg. 42, 15 pgs.

Burns, T. y G. M. Stalker. 1961. The Management of Innovation. London: Tavistock Publications.

Certo, S.C. 2001. Administración Moderna, 8a. ed. Bogotá, Colombia: Pearson Educación de Colombia, Ltda.

Chandler, A.D., Jr. 1962. Strategy and Structure. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press

Chennai, B. 2003. “Of Chaos and Complexity”. Businessline: pg. 1.

DeGrauwe, P., Dewatcher, H. y Embrects, M. (1993). Exchange rate theory: chaotic models of foreign exchange markets. Blackwell, Oxford, UK.

Deshpande, R. y J.U. Farley. 1998. "Measuring Market Orientation: A Generalization and Synthesis". Journal of Market Focused Management 2: 213-232.

Dessler, G. 1979. Organización y Administración: Un Enfoque Situacional. Cali, Colombia: Prentice-Hall International.

Dill, W.R. 1958. "Environment as an Influence on Managerial Autonomy." Administrative Science Quarterly 2: 409-443.

Doty, D.H., W.H. Glick y G.P. Huber. 1993. "Fit, Equifinality, and Organizational Effectiveness: A Test of Two Configurational Theories". Academy of Management Journal 36: 1196-1250.

Drago, A.W., 1998. “Mintzberg’s Pentagon and Organisation Positioning”. Management Research News 21, Iss. 4/5: 30.

Galbraith, J.R. 1973. Designing Complex Organizations. Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.

Gleick, J. 1987. Chaos Making a New Science. New York: Penguin Books.

Gutiérrez S. R. 1992. Introducción a la Filosofía. México: Editorial Esfinge, S.A. de C.V.

Gresov C. y R. Drazin. 1997. "Equifinality: Functional Equivalence in Organizational Design." Academy of Management Review 22: 403-438.

Gurpreet, D. y J. Ward. 2002. “Chaos Theory as a Framework for Studying Information Systems” . Information Resources Management Journal 15, Iss. 2; 5-9.

Hrebeniak, L., y W. Joyce. 1985. “Organizational Adaptation: Strategic Choice and Environmental Determinism”. Administrative Science Quarterly 30: 336-349.

Hopkins, T. 1937. Integration: Its Meaning and Application. N. Y.: Appleton-Century-Crofts.

Jennings,D.F. y S.L. Seaman. 1994. "High and Low Levels of Organizational Adaptation: An Empirical Analysis of Strategy, Structure, and Performance." Strategic Management Journal 15: 459-475.

Johnson, G. y K. Scholes. 2001. Dirección Estratégica, 5a. Ed. Madrid, España: Pearson Educación, S.A.

Katz, D. y R.L. Kahn. 1966. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons.

Katz, D. y R.L. Kahn. 1978. The Social Psychology of Organizations. New York, N.Y: John Wiley & Sons.

Kauffman, S. 1995. Laws of Self Organization. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Lawrence, P.R. y J.W. Lorsch. 1969. Organizations and Environments. Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin.

Lorsch, J.W. y J.J. Morse. 1974. Organizations and Their Members: A Contingency Approach. New York, NY: Harper and Row.

Matsuno, K. y J.T. Mentzer. 2000. "The Effects of Strategic Type on the Market Orientation Performance Relationship”. Journal of Marketing 64: 1-16.

Meyer, A. D., A. S. Tsui y C. R. Hinings. 1993. “Configurational Approaches to Organizational Analysis”. Academy of Management Journal 36: 1175-1195.

Miles, R.E. y C.C. Snow. 1978. Organizational Strategy, Structure and Process. New York, N.Y.: McGraw-Hill.

Miles, R.E., C.C. Snow, A.D. Meyer y H.J. Coleman Jr. 1978. "Organizational Strategy, Structure, and Process." Academy of Management Review 12: 607-621.

Miller, D. 1987. “The genesis of configuration”. Journal of Management Studies, 12: 686-701.

Mintzberg, H. T. 1979. The Structuring of Organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Mintzberg, H. T. 1993. Structure in Fives: Designing Effective Organizations, 2nd Ed., Prentice-Hall: Englewood Cliffs, N.J.

Nadler, D. A., y Tushman, M. L. 1988. Strategic Organization Design. Glenwood, IL: Scott,

Peters, E. 1991. Chaos And Order in Capital Markets. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Porter, M.E. 1980. Competitive Strategy. New York, NY: Free Press.

Prichett, P. y Pound, R. 2001. The Stress of Organizational Change. Piano, Texas: Pritchett Rummler-Brache.

Pugh, D.S., D.J. Hickson, C.R. Hinnings y C. Turner. 1969. "The Context of Organizational Structures." Administrative Science Quarterly 14: 91-114.

Radzicki, M. J. 1990.” Institutional Dynamics, Deterministic Chaos, and Self-organizing Systems”, Journal of Economic Issues, 24,1,57-102.

Scott, W. R. 1992. Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, 3rd Ed. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Stacey, R. D. 1991. The Chaos Frontier - Creative Strategic Control for Business, Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford.

Stoner, J. A., F. R. E. Freeman y D. R. Gilbert, Jr. 1996. Administración. México: Prentice Hall Hispanoamericana, S. A.

Van de Ven, A.H. y R. Drazin. 1985. "The Concept of Fit in Contingency Theory." Research in Organizational Behavior, Eds B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.

pp. 33-375.

Venkatraman, N. y J. E. Prescott. 1990. “Environment-structure Coalignment: An Empirical Test of its Performance Implications”. Strategic Management Journal, 11: 1-23.

von Bertalanffy, L., 1930. Kritische Theorie der Formbildung. Vienna: Schaltz Publishing.

von Bertalanffy, L. 1960. General Systems Theory. New York, NY: George Braziller.