Knowledge management and telecommunication services innovation in Mexican firms
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn9.18-8Keywords:
Knowledge Management, Innovation in Services, Telecommunications Services, Innovation TypologyAbstract
The purpose of this research paper is to provide with empirical evidence that helps to support to the roll of the knowledge management in telecommunications services innovation in Service Providers operating in México. The followed methodology was based on the data collection from primary sources, through an electronic questionnaire applied via Web, which was sent to CEOs, CIOs, CTOs, COOs and other officers, also to managers and specialists of Large companies as well SMEs of the telecommunications sector in Mexico. A total of 400 invitations were sent and 185 were answered and useful for the investigation (46% of rate of answer). The hypotheses were tested using structural equations modeling by partial least square (PLS). The findings present knowledge management as a coordinated mechanism and the empirical evidence supports the argument that states that a company with knowledge management capabilities uses the resources more efficiently, therefore is more innovating. The implications and limitations of the present research have to do with the fact that were performed only in one sector of the economic activity and it is circumscribed to Mexico, therefore would be necessary to replicate it different contexts. The practical implications are focused to serve as a support, to show the importance of knowledge management and his impact on innovation within the company, helping in the creation of the business case to justify the funding necessary to implement the internal programs and the acquisition of specialized software and hardware. The originality value of the research work has to do with fact of being one of the few of this type in Mexico and that is focused in the telecommunications sector.
Downloads
References
Capon, N., Farley, J. U., Lehmann, D. R., & Hulbert, J. M. (1992). Profiles of Product Innovators Among Large U.S. Manufacturers. Management Science, 38(2), 157-169.
Carneiro, A. (2000). How does knowledge management influence innovation and competitiveness? Journal of Knowledge Management, 4(2), 87-98.
Cashin, W. E. (1988). Students Ratings of Teaching: A Summary of the Research. Kansas: Kansas State University, Centre for Faculty Evaluation & Development.
CNN Expansión. (2011). Las 500 empresas mas importantes de México 2011. CNN Expansión, México, D.F. From http://www.cnnexpansion.com/tablas/2012/07/10/las-500-empresas- mas-importantes-de-mexico-2011
Cochran, W. G. (1977). Sampling Techniques. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
COFETEL (2008). Concesions. Retrieved Monday de September de 2008 from Federal Telecommunications Commision: http://www.cofetel.gob.mx/wb/Cofetel_2008/Cofe_concesiones_permisos_y_autorizaciones
Conner, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A Resource-Based Theory of the Firm: Knowledge Versus Opportunism. Organization Science, 7(5), 477-501.
Connor, K. R., & Prahalad, C. K. (1996). A resource-based theory of the firm: knowledge versus oportunism. Organization Science , 7(5), 477-501.
Avlontis, G., Papastathopoulou, P., & Gounari, S. (2001). An Empirically-Based Typology of Product Innovativeness For New Financial Services: Success and Failure Scenarios. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 18(5), 324-342.
Blosch, M. (2000). Customer knowledge. Knowledge and Process Management, 7(4), 265-268.
Badii, M. H., Flores, A. E., Foroughbakhch, R., & Quiróz, H. (1995). Sampling Fundaments. In M. H. Badii, A. E. Flores, & L. J. Galán, Fundaments and Perspectives for Biological Control (pp. 129-144). Monterrey: U.A.N.L.
Darroch, J. (2003). Developing a measure of knowledge management behaviors and practices. Journal fo knowledge management, 7(5), 41-54.
Darroch, J. (2005). Knowledge management, innovation and firm performance. Journal of knowledge management, 9(3), 101-115.
Davenport, T., & Prusak, L. (1998). Working Knowledge. Boston, Massachusetts: Harvard Business School Press.
Demarest, M. (1997). Knowledge Management: An Introduction. From: http://www.noumenal.com/marc/km1.pdf
Escorsa, P., & Valls, J. (1997). Tecnología e Innovación en la Empresa: Dirección y Gestión. Barcelona, España: Edicions UPC.
Expansión. (2007). Top 500 Mexican Firms. México: Expansión.
Fernandez, E. M., & Vázquez, J. (2000). Typology and strategic analysis of intangible resources. Technovation, 20(2), 81-92.
Freeman, C. (1982). The Economics of Industrial Innovation. London, UK: Franes Printer.
Gadrey, J., Gallouj, F., & Weinstein, O. (1995). New modes of innovation. International Journal of Service Industry Management, 6(3), 4-16.
Griffin, A., & Hauser, J. R. (1996). Integrating R&D and marketing: a review and analysis of the literature. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13(3), 191-215.
Hall, R. (2006). A framework linking intangible resources and capabiliites to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 14(8), 607 - 618.
Hall, R. (1993). A framework linking intangible resources and capabilities to sustainable competitive advantage. Strategic Management Journal, 4(8), 607-619.
Kandampully, J. (2002). Innovation as the core of competency of a service organization: The role of technology, knowledge and networks. European journal of innovation management, 5(1), 18-26.
Kor, Y., & Mahoney, J. (2004). Edith Penrose’s (1959) Contributions to the Resource-based View of Strategic Management. Journal of Management Studies, 41(1), 183-191.
Majchrzak, A., Cooper, L. P., & Neece, O. E. (2004). Knowledge reuse for innovation. Management science, 50(2), 174-188.
Mexican Economy Secretary. (2008). Diagnostic of the Micro and SMEs. Retrieved Monday de September de 2008 from Mexican Economy Secretary:
http://www.economia.gob.mx/pics/p/p2757/DIAGNOSTICODEMICROPEQUENASYMEDIANASEMPRESAS.pdf
Nelson, R. (1991). Why Do the Firms Differ, and How Does It Matter? Strategic Management Journal, 12(S2), 61-74.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. (1982). An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.
Nelson, R., & Winter, S. G. (2002). Evolutionary Theorizing in Economics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 16(2), 23-46.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). The knowledge-creation company. México DF: Oxford University Press.
OECD. (2004). Knowledge Management: Innovation in the Knowledge Economy. Paris: OECD Publications Service.
OECD. (2005). Oslo Manual. Paris: OECD Publications Service.
OECD. (2004). The significance of knowledge management in the business sector. Paris:OECD Publicationes.
Oke, A. (2004). Barriers to Innovation Managemente in Service Companies. Journal of Change Management, 4(1), 31-44.
Oke, A. (2002). Making it happen: How to improve innovative capability in a service company. Journal of Change Management, 2(3), 272-281.
Penrose, E. T. (1959). The Theory of the Growth of the Firm. New York: John Wiley .
Picker, S., Rhunke, A., & Leker, J. (2005). Knowledge Management- Factor of Success. University of Muenster, Institute of Business Administration.
Porter, M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. Harvard Business Review, 2, 73-93.
Preiss, K. (1999). Modelling of knowledge flows and their impact. Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 36-36. Public Health
Agency of Canada (2004). Young people in Canada: their health and well-being- Chapter 10: Emotional Health. Retrieved November de 2008 from Public Health Agency of Canada: http://www.phac-aspc.gc.ca/dca-dea/publications/hbsc-
/chapter_10-eng.php
Ridderstrale, J., & Nordström, K. (2000). Funky Business. Madrid: Pearson Educación.
Ringle, C. M. (2005). SmartPLS. Hamburg, Germany. From http://www.smartpls.de
Rositas, J. (2005). Factores críticos de éxito en la gestión de calidad y su grado de presencia e impacto en la industria manufacturera mexicana. Disertación doctoral no publicada,
Universidad Autónoma Nuevo León, Monterrey.
Royer, I., & Zarlowski, P. (2001). Sampling. In Thietart, R.A. Doing management research. Thousand Oaks (California): SAGE Publications, 147-171.
Teece, D. (2005). Technology And Technology Transfer: Mansfieldian Inspirations and Subsequent Develoments. Journal of Technology Transfer, 30(1), 17-33.
Zapata, L. (2004). Generation and knowledge transfer determinats in Spanish sector of information technology SMEs in Barcelona. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Universitat Autónoma de Barcelona , Barcelona.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Innovaciones de Negocios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs magazine is a free and open access electronic magazine of a scientific-academic nature and is a publication of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in which the authors retain their copyright and grant the magazine the exclusive right to first publication of the work. Third parties are allowed to use the published content, as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and the first publication in this journal is cited.
For more information, please contact the Research Secretary (FACPyA) of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Telephone: (81) 1340-4430. Email: revinnova@uanl.mx