Revisión de los principales modelos de diseño instruccional

Francisco Javier Jardines Garza

doi:10.29105/rinn8.16-7

Authors

Francisco Javier Jardines Garza Autonomous University of Nuevo León

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn8.16-7

Keywords:

Instructional Design, Instructional Development, Instructional Materials, Models Taxonomy

Abstract

The intention of this document is to describe and to analyze the taxonomy of Instructional Development models (ID) elaborated by Kent L. Gustafson and Robert Maribe Branch (2002). A taxonomy of ID models is useful because it allows to identify and to analyze in a more expeditious way each model and help us to consider which can be more useful in the application in different situation. Three categories in the classification settled down of ID:
a) Instruction in the classroom, b) products for implementation by other users, and c) instructional systems more extensive and complexes directed to problems or goals of an organization. In order to categorize the models, nine characteristics of the ID models are considered: characteristic product in terms of prepared instruction; resources entrusted to the developed attempt, if it is an individual effort or teamwork, the ability and experience that ID delay of the individual or the team, if the instructional materials are selected of the existing
resources or represent a design and original product; the amount of realized preliminary analysis, the anticipated technological complexity of development atmospheres and gives, the amount of realized tests and revision, the amount of diffusion and pursuit that happens after the development. This taxonomy is not unique nor is the best one of the classifications ID models but it possible to be concluded that he is useful for the professionals, instructional and educating investigators, and designers in the development of its educative activities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akker, J. van den, Branch, R., Gustafson, K., Nieveen, N., & Plomp, T. (1999). Design approaches and tools in education and training. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.

Barson, J. (1967). Instructional systems development: A demonstration and evaluation project: Final report. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 020673)

Bass, C., & Romiszowski, A. (Eds.) (1997). Instruccional development paradigms. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Bergman, R., & Moore, T. (1990). Managing interactive video/multimedia projects. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology Publications.

Boehm, B. (1988). A Spiral model of software development and enhancement. IEEE Computer, 21 (2), pp. 61-72.

Branch, R. (1997). Perceptions of instructional design process models. In R. E. Griffin, D. C. Beauchamp, I. M. Hunter, & C. B. Schiffman (Eds.), In VisionQuest: Journeys toward visual literacy. Selected readings from the 28th Annual Conference of the International Visual Literacy Association, Cheyenne, WY. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 408998)

Branson, R.K. (1975). Interservice procedures for instruccional systems development: Executive summary and model. Tallahassee, FL: Center for Educational Technology,

Florida State University. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 122 022)

De Hoog, R., De Jong, T. & De Vries, F. (1994). Constraint driven software design: an escape from the waterfall model. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 7 (3). pp. 48-63. ISSN 0898-5952

Diamond, R.M. (1989). Designing and improving courses and curricula in higher education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 304056)

Dick, W., Carey, L., & Carey, J. (2001). The systematic design of instruction (5th ed.). New York: Longman.

Dorsey, L., Goodrum, D., & Schwen, T. (1997). Rapid collaborative prototyping as an instructional development paradigm. In C. Dills & A. Romiszowski (Eds.), Instructional development paradigms (pp.445-465). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Educational Technology

Publications (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 407 932)

Ertmer, P., & Quinn, J. (1999). The ID casebook: Case studies in instructional design. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill.

Gentry, C. G. (1994). Introduction to instructional development: Process and technique. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.

Gerlach, V. S., & Ely, D.P. (1980). Teaching and media: A systematic approach (2nd ed.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall Incorporated.

Gilbert, T. (1978). Human competence: Engineering worthy performance. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Goodyear, P. (1997). Instructional design environments: Methods and tools for the design of complex instructional systemas. In S. Dijkstra, N. Seel, F. Schott, & R. Tennyson (Eds.), Instructional design: International perspectives, Vol. 2. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Gustafson, K.L., Branch, R.M. (2002) Survey of instructional development models. (4th Ed.). Syracuse, NY: ERIC Clearinghouse on Information & Technology, Syracuse University: (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 211 097)

Hamreus, D. (1968). The systems approach to instructional development. In The contribution of behavioral science to instructional technology. Monmouth, Oregon: Oregon State

System of Higher Education, Teaching Research Division. (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED 041448)

Heinich, R., Molenda, M., Russell, J., & Smaldino, S. (1999). Instructional media and technologies for learning (6th) ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.

Mager, R. & Pipe P. (1984). Analyzing performance problems: Or you really aught wanna (2nd ed.). Belmont, CA: Lake Publishing.

Morrison, G., Ross, S., & Kemp, J. (2001). Designing effective instruction (3rd ed.). New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Newby, T., Stepich, D., Lehman, J., & Russell, J. (2000). Instructional Technology for teaching and learning: Designing instruction, integrating computers, and using media (2nd

ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.

Nieveen, N. (1997). Computer support for curriculum developers: A study on the potential of computer support in the domain of formative evaluation. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.

Seel, N. M. (1997). Models of instructional design: Introduction and overview. In R. D. Tennyson, R. Schott, N. Seel., & S. Dijkstra (Eds.), Instructional design, Vol. 1., International perspectives (pp. 355-359). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Seels, B., & Glasgow, Z. (1998). Making instructional design decisions (2nd Ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Merrill, Prentice-Hall.

Smith, P., & Ragan, T. (1999). Instructional design. New York: John Wiley & Sons.

Tessmer, M., & Wedman, J. (1995). Context-sensitive instructional design models: A response to design research studies and criticism. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8 (3), 38-54.

Visscher-Voerman, I. (1999). Design approaches: A reconstructive study in training and education. Doctoral dissertation, University of Twente, Enschede, The Netherlands.