Second foreign language learning strategies and their variations across language proficiency levels among Iranian EFL learners
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn3.6-10Keywords:
EFL, Proficiency, Second Foreign LanguageAbstract
The present study has attempted to determine weather there is any relationship between language learning strategies employed by language learners, and if so what relationship exists between them. Furthermore, it has tried to investigate what effective and useful strategies the learners employ while learning English as a foreign language correspondent with their proficiency levels. A simulated TOEFL (REA, 1993) test was initially administered to classify the learners into three classes of proficiency levels. Oxford‟s Strategy Inventory, SILL, (Oxford, 1990) was used to determine the frequency of the language learning strategies applied by learners. The results of this study provide confirmation of previous research findings concerning the direct relationship between language learning strategies and language proficiency level, and represent the types of the strategies adopted by advanced, intermediate and elementary language learners. The implications of this study are to suggest both the metacognitive compensatory strategies, the most frequent strategies employed by advanced learners be instructed to the language learners in order to upgrade their proficiency level.
Downloads
References
Bowen, D. J., H. Madsen. & A. Hilfery. 1985. TESOL techniques and procedures. Massachusetts, Newbury House Publication, INC.
Brown, D. H. 2000. Principles of language learning and teaching. (4th ed.). White Plains, New York, Longman.
Brown, H. D. 20001. Teaching by principles: an interactive approach to language pedagogy. (2nd ed.). London. Longman.
Bialystok, E. 1978. A theoretical model of second language learning. Language learning, 28: 69-83.
Chamot, A. 1987. The learning strategies of ESL students. New York, Prentice Hall.
C
hastain, K. 1988. Developing second-language learning skills: theory and practice. (3rd ed.). Chicago: Harcourt Brace Javanovich Publishers.
Cohen, D. A. 1990. Language learning: insights for learners, teachers and researchers. New York, Newbury House & Harper Collins.
Cohen, D. A. 1998. Strategies in learning and using a second language. TESL- EJ. 3(4): 1-5.
Cook, V. 1991. Second language learning and language teaching. New York, Edward Arnold.
Cummins, J. 1979. Putting language proficiency in its place: Responding to critiques of the conversational/academic language distinction. TESOL Quarterly, 12: 17- 21.
Cummins, J. 1980. The cross-lingual dimensions of language proficiency: Implications for bilingual education and the optimal age issue. TESOL Quarterly, 14: 175-187.
Cummins, J., & M. Swain. 1983. Analysis by rhetoric: Reading the text or the readers‟ own projections? a reply to Edelsky et al. Applied Linguistics, 4 (1): 23-41.
Ellis, R. 1987. Second language acquisition in context. New York, Prentice Hall.
Ellis, R. 1994. The study of second language acquisition. Oxford, Oxford University Press.
Green, J. M., & R. L. Oxford. 1995. A closer look at learning strategies, L2. proficiency, and gender, TESOL Quarterly, 29: 261-297.
Hughes, A. 1996. Testing for language teachers. (8th printing). Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Naiman, H., A. Frohlich and J. Todesco. 1975. The good second language learner. In: J. C. Richards & W. A. Renandya. 2002. Methodology in language teaching: an anthology of current practice. New York, Cambridge University Press.
Nation-Thomas, W. P. 1992. An analysis of the research methodology of the Ramirez study. Bilingual Research Journal, 16 (1-2): 213-25.
Nunan, D. 1999. Second language teaching and learning. Boston. Massachusetts. Heinle & Heinle.
O‟Malley, J. M., & A. Chamot. 1990. Learning strategies in second language acquisition. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: A synthesis of studies with implications for strategy training. System, 17: 235-247.
Oxford, R. L. 1990. Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. New York, Heinle & Heinle.
Richards, J. C., J. Platt & H. Platt. 1992. Dictionary of language teaching and applied linguistics. (2nd Ed.). London, Longman.
Rubin, J. 1975. What the “good language learner” can teach us. TESOL Quarterly, 9 (11): 41-90.
Rubin, J. 1987. Learning strategies: Theoretical assumptions, research history and typology. Englewood Cliffs, New Jersy, Prentice Hall.
Stern, H. H. 1997. Fundamental concepts of language teaching. (7th impression). London, Oxford University Press.
Su, M., M. 2005. A study of EFL technological and vocational college students‟ language learning and their self-perceived English proficiency. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching. (On-line), 2 (1). Available at: http://e-flt.nus.edu.sg/.
Vossoughi, H. & J. Javaherian. 2000. An encyclopedic dictionary of teaching English as a foreign language. Tehran, Rahnama Publication.
Weistein, C. & R. Mayer. 1986. The teaching of learning strategies. (3rd Ed.). New York, Macmillan.
Wenden, A. & J. Rubin. 1987. Learner strategies in language learning. New Jersey, Prentice Hall.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Innovaciones de Negocios

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs magazine is a free and open access electronic magazine of a scientific-academic nature and is a publication of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in which the authors retain their copyright and grant the magazine the exclusive right to first publication of the work. Third parties are allowed to use the published content, as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and the first publication in this journal is cited.
For more information, please contact the Research Secretary (FACPyA) of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Telephone: (81) 1340-4430. Email: revinnova@uanl.mx