A methodologica proposal to evaluate teaching learning process in a virtual environment
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn4.8-8Keywords:
Assessment Process, New Information Technologies, On Line Environment, Student PerformanceAbstract
This article provides a methodological proposal oriented to optimize the
assessment process of a student performance on an on line environment through the application of group communication techniques (advisor-student, student-advisor, studentstudent, student-chat and so on) and widespread use of the new technologies on information and telecommunication as basic tools, based one the process follow-up and statistical data collection from the student´s learning performance and behaviour to enable the construction of significant and reliable indexes thus allowing the advisor a diagnostic on the student´s
attitude and performance, allowing him to take on time the adequate preventive/corrective decision measures based on a success/failure tests outputs from the student performance, on a day- to- day basis, on the line environment.
Downloads
References
Ackerman, S. del M. y T. W. Malowne. 1990. Jardín de la respuesta: Una herramienta para crecer memoria de organización. En los procedimientos de la conferencia de ACM sobre sistemas de información de oficina, páginas 31-39.
Alonso, C. M. y D. J. Gallego. 2003. Como diagnosticar y mejorar los estilos de aprendizaje. Madrid: UNED, Formación Permanente.
Andriessen, J. y J. Sandberg. 1999. Where is Education Heading and How about AI.? International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10, 130-150.
Barberà, E. 2000. "Study actions in a virtual university". Virtual University Journal, 3 (2), p. 31-42.
Barberà, E. coord. 2001. La incógnita de la educación a distancia. Barcelona, ICE/Horsori.
Bloom, B. editor. 1971. Taxonomía de los objetivos de la educación, editorial el ateneo, Argentina.
Booch, G., I. Jacobson and J. Rumbaugh. 1998. The Unified Modeling Language User Guide.Addison-Wesley. Massachusetts-USA.
Chadwick, J. 1989. Evaluación Formativa Editorial Paidos.
Díaz, B., F y R. G. Hernández. 1997. Estrategias Docentes para un Aprendizaje Significativo, Una interpretación constructivista, Predicción. México: Mc Graw Hill.
Felton, J., J. Mitchell, y M. Stinson. 2004. Webbased student evaluations of professors: the relations between perceived quality, easiness and sexiness. Assessment y Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (1), 91108.Laurillard, D. M. (1993). Rethinking
University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. Routledge, London.
Garcia Aretio, L. 2002. La educación a distancia. De la teoría a la práctica. Barcelona: Ariel.
Gimeno Sacristán, J. 1992. Teoría de la Enseñanza y Desarrollo del Curriculum. Anaya, Madrid, 1981.
Hietala, P. et al, 1998. The Virtual Campus: Trends for Higher Education and Training, chapter Using the World-Wide Web to promote educational discussions on University Level Courses, pages 169-183. IFIP. Chapman & Hall.
Holmberg, B. 1985. Status and Trends of Distance Education. Sweden: Lector publishing.
Holmberg, B. 1995. Theory and Practice of Distance Education. Londres: Rouledge.
Ingmultimed (2005). UPC. Evaluación del alumno en el entorno virtual: Identificación de indicadores inherentes y adyacentes.
http://doctorat.egim.net/gimmaster/jcl/doctorat/documentos/contenido1.asp?id=20&ide=2&cod=2
Kember, D., D. Y. P. Leung, y K. P. Kwan. 2002. Does the Use of Student Feedback Questionnaires Improve the Overall Quality of Teaching?Assessment Y Evaluation in Higher Education, 27 (5), 411425.
Montilva, J. 1999. “An Object-Oriented Approach to Business Modeling in Information Systems Development”. Proc. of the 5 th Int. Conf. on Information Systems, Analysis and Synthesis, SCI/ISAS99, Orlando-USA, Vol.2, p. 358-364.
Lafourcade, P. D. 1972. Evaluación de los aprendizajes. Madrid: Cincel.
Laurillard, D. M. 1993. Rethinking University Teaching: A Framework for the Effective Use of Educational Technology. Routledge, London.
Maccario, B. 1989. Teoría y práctica de la evaluación de las actividades físicas y deportivas. Bs.As. Ed. Lidium.
Mayes, T. y I. Neilson. 1995. Innovate Adult Learning with Innovate Technologies, chapter Learning from other people dialogues: questions about computer based answers,
pages 31-48. Number A61 in IFIP Series. Elsevier Science B.V (North Holland).
Murray, T. 1999. Authoring intelligent tutoring systems: an analysis of the state of the art. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education, 10.Pila Teleña, A. (1995).
Preparación física. Tomos I-II-III. Madrid. Editorial. Augusto Pila Teleña, 1985.
Pila Teleña, A. 1995. Preparación física. Tomos I-II-III. Madrid. Editorial. Augusto Pila Teleña, 1985.
Pila Teleña, A. 1997. Evaluación Deportiva: Los tests de laboratorio al campo, 3ª Ed. Madrid.
Pratt, D. D. 1997. Reconceptualizing the evaluation of teaching in higher education. Higher Education, 34(1), 23 44 .29).
Rotger B. 1990. Evaluación Formativa Editorial Cincel. Madrid. España.
Royce, W. 1970. Managing the development of Large software systems: concepts and Techniques. Proceedings, Wescon, agosto, 1970, citado en Piattini (1996).
Rubbens, F. M. y J. M. Moreno. 1971. Enseñanza Programada. Ediciones en lengua holandesa y francesa C.D.U. Núm. 65.022.56.371.3. PHILIPS – Orientación Educativa.
Ruiz C. 1991. Análisis de la administración de la Evaluación Formativa que realizan los docentes de la tercera etapa de Educación Básica en planteles del Distrito Nº 5 del Area metropolitana de Caracas, y su posible efecto sobre el rendimiento estudiantil Tesis de Maestría UPEL.
Sainz Leyva, L. 1998. La Enseñanza Tutelar como Modelo de Comunicación. Pedagógica Democrática. Rev. Cubana Educ. Med. Sup, 12 (2). 49-53.
Sainz Leyva, L. 2002. Educación On Line: Una alternativa posible. (Centro de Gestión Empresarial, Superación Técnica y Administrativa – GESTA - CUBA).
Schank, R. C. y C. Cleary. 1994. Engines for Education. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, http://www.ils.nwu.edu/~e_for_e.
Thomas, R. 1993. The CTISS file, chapter Interact: Interactive Engineering teaching and learning project, pages 47-48. Oxford University Press.
Verdejo, F. y S. Cerri. 1994. Collaborative dialogue technologies in distance learning, volume 133 of NATO Series on Computers and Systems Sciences. Springer-Verlag.
Woodward, H. y P. Nanlohy. 2004. Digital portfolios. fact or fashion? Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 29 (2), 625-648.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Innovaciones de Negocios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs magazine is a free and open access electronic magazine of a scientific-academic nature and is a publication of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in which the authors retain their copyright and grant the magazine the exclusive right to first publication of the work. Third parties are allowed to use the published content, as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and the first publication in this journal is cited.
For more information, please contact the Research Secretary (FACPyA) of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Telephone: (81) 1340-4430. Email: revinnova@uanl.mx
