Measurement in the scientific research process: Content validity and reliability evaluation

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn6.11-2

Keywords:

Measurement, Construct, Content Validity, Reliability, Creativity, Speed, Efficiency and Effectiveness of the Innovative Process

Abstract

In scientific research a relevant issue is measurement. Elements that form part of the measurement process are discussed. These elements are the following: the operationalization of variables, the relationship among theory and measurement, scales as measurement instruments, the meaning of the latent variable, validity and reliability as essential properties of measurement, also including content validity. Through the understanding of these elements, the relevance of the measurement process is established. Besides, the process of content validity and the estimation of reliability of a developed scale are described.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abrahamson, M. (1983). Social research methods. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.

Alam, I. (2006, September). Service innovation strategy and process: A cross-national comparative analysis. International Marketing Review, 23(3), 234-254.

Amabile, T. 1995, 23 de Enero. Creativity Killers [Stevens, Tim]. Industry Week (US), sec. ISSN/ISBN 00390895, p. 63.

Amabile, T., Conti, R., Coon, H., & Lazenby, J. &. H., Michael. 1996. Assesing the work environment for creativity. Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1154-1184.

Araya, Y. C. 2005, Junio. Una revisión crítica del concepto de creatividad. Actualidades Investigativas en Educación, 5(1), 1-30.

Carbonell, Pilar & Rodríguez, Ana Isabel. 2006. Cómo acelerar el proceso de desarrollo de los nuevos productos en diferentes contextos de complejidad tecnológica. Universia Business Review. 92-103

Carbonell, Pilar & Rodríguez, Ana Isabel. 2006. The Impact of market characteristics and innovation speed on perceptions of positional advantage and new product performance.

International Journal of Research in Marketing. 23.1-12.

Carmines, E. G. & Zeller, R. A. (1979). Reliability and Validity Assesment. Beverly Hills. Sage Publications.

Cegarra J. (1999). Eficiencia en I/D y en Innovación Tecnológica. Boletín Intexter (UPC), 116, 77-83.

Covin, J. G. y Slevin, D.P.1989. Strategic Management of Small Firms in Hostile and Benign Environments. Strategic Management Journal.

Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research Design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed method approaches. 2nd. Edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.

Cronbach Lee J & Meel, P. E. 1995. Construct Validity in Psychological Tests. Psychological Bulletin, 52, 1-29.

Damanpour, F. 1991, Sep. Organizational Innovation: A meta-Analysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34(3), 555-590.

Davenport, T. H. 2005. Thinking for a Living HBS Press (Ed.), (pp. 1-10). US: Library of Congress Cataloging-in-Publication Data.

Davila, A. 1999. Efectividad Organizacional: Implicaciones teóricas y prácticas para el estudio de las organizaciones en América Latina. Ciencias Administrativas, 1(2), 11-34.

DeVellis, R. F. (1991). Scale development: Theory and applications. California. Sage Publications. Francoise Henri, J. 2004, 6/11/2004). Performance Measurement and Organizational

Effectiveness: Bridging the Gap. Managerial Finance, 30(6), 93-123.

Hernández-Sampieri, R.H., Fernández-Collado, C y Baptista-Lucio, P. 1991 y 2003. Metodología de la Investigación. México: McGraw-Hill.

Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B. (2002) Investigación del Comportamiento: Métodos de Investigación en ciencias sociales, México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores.

Kerlinger, F.N. & Lee, H.B. (2002) Investigación del Comportamiento: Métodos de Investigación en ciencias sociales, México: McGraw-Hill Interamericana Editores.

Kessler, E. H. &. C., Alok K. 1996, 21/10/1996. Innovation Speed: A conceptual model of context, antecedents, and outcomes. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1143-1191.

Klein, K. J. &. S., Joann Speer. (1996, 21/10/1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055-1080.

Klein, K. J. &. S., Joann Speer. (1996, 21/10/1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21(4), 1055-1080.

Martínez del Río, Javier & Céspedes-Lorente, José. 2006 Generación y Difusión de la innovación en distritos industriales. Universidad Almeria.

Mendoza, J. (2005). Toward a Group Empowerment Model in Mexican Organizations. A Structural Equation Modeling Approach. ITESM. Monterrey, N.L. (Disertación Doctoral).

Mostafa, Mohamed. 2005 University of Sharjah United Arab Emirates. Factors affecting organisational creativity and innovativeness in Egyptian business organisaions: an empirical investigation. The Journal of Management Development 24(1/2) 7-31.

Nunnaly, Jum C. and Berstein, Ira H. 1994. Psychometric Theory. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Prat, S. Remei & Doval, D. Eduardo. 2005. Construcción y análisis de escalas. Análisis Multivariable para las Ciencias Sociales. Pearson Prentice Hall, Cap 2,74-76.

Rositas, J., M (2006) Factores Criticos de éxito en la gestión de calidad y su grado de presencia e impacto en la industria manufacturera mexicana. Monterrey. México: UANL.

Zahra S. y Covin, J. 1995. Contextual Influence on the Corporate Entrepreneurship-Performance Relationship. Journal of Business Venturing.

Published

2009-01-23

How to Cite

Mendoza, J., & Garza, J. B. (2009). Measurement in the scientific research process: Content validity and reliability evaluation. Innovaciones De Negocios, 6(11), 17–32. https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn6.11-2