Modelo de selección de personal en base a perfil de competencias

S Peña

doi:10.29105/rinn2.3-9

Authors

S Peña Autonomous University of Nuevo León

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn2.3-9

Keywords:

Human Resources, Personnel Selection, Selection Based on Competition

Abstract

This investigation is oriented to solve issues related with the selection of the adequate personnel in companies and the high costs that are consequences of these decisions. Its objective is to contribute to determine the adequate tools necessary to create a more reliable and successful job through the formation of a model that takes into considerations variables that are used nowadays in the labor area. This investigation was made through questionnaires that were applied to industrial, commercial and service companies. The main contribution of this investigation is the structure of a model for selecting personnel taking as a foundation their competitions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arias, G. F. 2003. Administración de Recursos Humanos, editorial Trillas.

Baum, N. H. 2000, How to hire the ideal candidate for your practice, Urology Times, Cleveland, 28(10): 44-46.

Beer, M., B. Spector, P. R. Lawrence, D. Q. Mills, y R. E. Walton. 2002. Dirección de los Recursos Humanos, Técnicas de Harvard Bussiness School, editorial Cecsa.

Bernd, M. 2003. Attitudes towards Personnel Selection Methods, Applied Psychology. 52(4): 515-533.

Boyd B. L. 2003. Competencies for leaders of volunteers during the next decade, Administrator Reports-Research/Technical 143, Conference papers 150.

Brown, D. 2004. Unwanted online jobseekers swamp HR staff, Canadian HR Reporter, Toronto. 17(7): 1-3.

Burak- Smith, M. 1999. Personnel Management, editorial: Cecsa.

Burney Simpson, 2004, New Solutions for Collector Turnover, Credit Card Management, New York. 17(2): 52-56.

Converse, P. D., F. L. Oswald. y M. A. Gillespie. Afield Kevin, Bizot Elizabeth B. 2004. “Matching individuals to occupations using abilities and the O Net, Issues and an application in Career Guidance. 57(2): 451-488.

Crowley, E. 2002. Personnel Selection Employment Interviews, Criteria. (30): 13-15.

Del Río González, C. 2004. Fundamentos de Administración Moderna de Personal, editorial Thomson.

Dessler, G. 2003. Administración de Personal, editorial Prentice Hall.

Dodds, J.E. 1975. Econometric Models of Personal Saving (Book Review), Kyklos. 28(3): 670-673.

Evans, B. 2004, Canadian RH Reporter, Personnel Selection Methods and Problems, Older Workers. 17(5): 19-23

Ferreira, H. A., 2000. El Currículum como desafío institucional, editorial Novedades Educativas.

Fletcher, S. 2004. Diseño de Capacitación basada en Competencias Laborales, editorial Panorama.

Hellriegel, D. 2000. Administración: un enfoque basado en competencias, editorial International Thompson.

Instituto de Estudios Pedagógicos Somosaguas. 2000. Educación para la ciudadanía: un enfoque basado en el desarrollo de competencias transversales, editorial Editora Narcea.

Koontz, H. y H. Weihrich. 2003. Administración una Perspectiva Global. editorial Mc Graw Hill.

Levy-Leboyer, C. 2000. Gestión de las competencias, editorial Editorial Gestión.

Macaleer, W. D. y B. Shannon Jones, R. M. Haviland. 2002. How HR technology was used to help the NBA and WNBA. Employment Relations Today, Hoboken. 29(2): 49.

Millward, L. J. y M. Cropley. 2003. Psychological contracting: Processes of contract formation during interviews between nannies and their employers. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, Leicester. 76: 213.

Mohamed, A. A. N. J. Orife y K. Wibowo. 2002. The legality of key word search as a personnel selection tool, Employee Relations, Bradford. 24(5): 516-523.

Mondy, R.W. 2003. Administración de Recursos Humanos, editorial Prentice Hall.

Moscoso, S. y J. Salgado. 2004. Fairness Reactions to Personnel Selection, Employee Selection, 12(½): 187-197.

Muchinsky, P. M. 2004 When the psychometrics of test development meets organizational realties: a conceptual framework for organizational change, Examples and Recommendations. 57(1): 175-205.

Oberauer, K. y W. Oliver. 2003. The Meaning (s) of Conditionals: Conditional Probabilities, Mental Models, and Personal Utilities, Journal of Experimental Psychology/Learning, Memory &

Cognition. 29(4): 680-694.

Pell, A. R. 2000. Administre a su Personal fácil, editorial Prentice-Hall.

Robbins, S. P. 2004. Administración. editorial Prentice Hall.

Shanteau, J. D. Weiss, R. Thomas. y J. Pounds. 2002. Performance-based assessment of expertise. How to decide if someone is an expert or not, European Journal of Operational Research. 136(2): 253-269.

Spencer J. E. 1975. Econometric Models of Personal Savings: the United Kingdom 1948-1966 (Book Review). Economica. 42(168): 451-457.

Stoner, J., R. E. Freeman. 2002. Administración, editorial Prentice Hall.

Templar, R. 2002. Evaluaciones de Personal, editorial Prentice Hall.

Thompson, D. W. y N. N. Thompson. 2003. The art of interviewing your next CEO, Trustee, Chicago, Tomo 56(2): 14-19.

Tyler, J., L. Biggs y L. Errol. 2002. Board selection and composition a shared responsibility, Healthcare Executive, Chicago. 17(3): 14-19.

Werther, J. y H. Davis. 2003. Administración de Personal y Recursos Humanos, editorial McGraw Hill.

Wilk, S. L. y P. Cappelli. 2003. Understanding the determinants of employer use of selection methods, Personnel Psychology. 56: 1.

Wolffe, K. E. y A. R. Candela. 2002. A Qualitative Analysis of Employers experiences with visually impaired, Journal of visual impairment & Birndess. 96(9): 622-634.

Yongsun, P. y C. M. Vance Charles. 2002. Evidence of back-home selection bias against US female expatriates, Women in Management Review, Bradford. 17(2): 68-80