Co-creación en la gestión de la tecnológica e innovación de las redes públicas mexicanas de investigación, desarrollo e innovación

Fernando Rodríguez Cano; Alberto de Jesús Pastrana

doi:10.29105/revin19.37-383

Authors

Fernando Rodríguez Cano Autonomous University of Queretaro https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6867-770X
Alberto de Jesús Pastrana Autonomous University of Queretaro

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/revin19.37-383

Keywords:

Co-creation, Management of technology and innovation, R&D&I Mexican public networks

Abstract

The present work is an hermeneutic study, which seeks to analyze the compatibility of a model of technology and innovation management based on the prevailing sociotechnical system in the Mexican public sector. Technology and innovation management processes have always had great complications in public sector institutions in Mexico. This is due to the harshness of the sociotechnical system that prevails in this sector, mainly due to public policies, the regulations by which they are governed, and even the laws and regulations internal to the institutions dedicated to Research, Development e Innovation (R&D&I). From this perspective, it seeks to analyze the co-creation process as part of the processes that are closely related to R&D&I of public institutions dedicated to this, not only as the generation of projects or technological developments to measure. , or at the request of the industrial sector, but, in the same way, it was possible to develop products based on the results obtained from applied research generated in public institutions. Information and knowledge societies are an important part of these processes, since, within a co-creation process, the processes for the generation of the integrating base of these societies are embedded. The generation of information resulting in knowledge will provide the guideline for the generation of new technological developments, which public R&D&I institutions will be able to see come true in co-creation with the private sector. For this, the collaboration of the different R&D&I institutions that collaborate in a network with other institutions is required, as well as the productive sector that provides guidelines for real work and market conditions.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Alavi, M., y Leidner, D. E. 2001. Knowledge Management and Knowledge Management Systems: Conceptual Foundations and Research Issues. MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25. No. 1. pp. 107-136. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/3250961

Atuesta, M., Ceballos, A., Gómez, R. (2016). Co-creación como metodología para la aporpiación social de la ciencia y la tecnología (ASCYT) del recurso agua. Curso Urabá-Antioqueño-Colombia. Revista USB Medellín-Colombia, Vol. 16, No. 1, enero-junio 2016. pp. 277-286, Medellín, Colombia. DOI: https://doi.org/10.21500/16578031.2176

Bindé, J. (2005). Hacia la Sociedad del Conocimiento. Ediciones Unesco.

Catells, M. (1996). La era de la información. Revista Economía Sociedad y Cultura, Vol. 1, México Siglo XXI.

Chesbrough, H. (2003). Open innovation: The new imperative for creating and profiting from technology. Harvard Business School Press. Boston, Estados Unidos.

Davenport, S., Miller, A. (2000). The formation and evolution of international research alliances in emergent technologies. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 11. pp.199-213. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1047-8310(00)00029-8

Druker, P. (1993). Post-Capitalist society. Ed. Butterworth Heinemann. California, Estados Unidos.

Echeverría, S. y Col. (2011). A proposal for Collaborative Knowledge Creation (CKC). The 9th Globelics International Conference. Noviembre 15 a 17. Buenos Aires, Argentina.

Enright, M. (1992). Why Local Clusters are the way to win in the game. Geographically , Ed. Harvard Business review, P.P. 93-51.

Forero, I. (2009). La sociedad del conocimiento. Revista Científica General José María Córdova, vol. 5, núm. 7, julio, 2009, pp. 40-44. Bogotá, Colombia.

Junta de gobierno. (2019). La educación obligatoria en México. Informe 2019. Instituto nacional para la evaluación de la educación. Revista Perfiles educativos, vol.41 no.164 México, abr/jun 2019. pp. 188-199. México, México. DOI: https://doi.org/10.22201/iisue.24486167e.2019.164.59386

Martínes K, y col. (2016). Barreras en la transferencia tecnológica: Un estudio cualitativo de las intervenciones breves y los centros de atención a las adicciones. Rev. Salud Ment, vol. 39, no. 5. México, Septiembre/octubre 2016. pp. 257-265. DOI: https://doi.org/10.17711/SM.0185-3325.2016.030

Martínez, I. y Ruiz, J. (2002). Los procesos de creación del conocimiento: El aprendizaje y la espiral de conversión del conocimiento. XVI Congreso Nacional de AEDEM. Junio. Alicante, España.

Nonaka, I. (1991) The knowledge-creating company. Harvard Business Review. Noviembre-Diciembre. pp. 96-104

OCDE (2019). Gross domestic expenditure on R&D by sector of performance and field of R&D. Obtenido el 27 de abril de 2019 de https://stats.oecd.org.

Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms or organization. Research in Organizational Behavior, volumen 12, 295–336.

Rip, A. y Kemp, R (1998). Resources and Tecnology: Technological Change. En Human Choice and Climatic Change. Vol. II. 1a ed., P.P. 327-399. Estados Unidos: Battelle Press.

Schwab, K. (2016). La cuarta revolución industrial. Foro Económico Mundial. Penguin Random House Grupo Editorial España. Barcelona España.

Segarra, M. y Bou, J. (2005). Conceptos, tipos y dimensiones del conocimiento: configuración del conocimiento estratégico. Revista de Economía y Empresa, Nº52 y 53 (2ª Época) 3º Cuatrimestre 2004 y 1º Cuatrimestre 2005. pp. 175-195.

Tamhain, H. (2008). Management of Technology: Managing Effectively in Technology-Intensive Organizations. 2a edición. Editorial Wiley.

Toche, N. (19 de septiembre de 2019). Presupuesto para ciencia y tecnología en México, muy lejos de lo que la ley mandata. El economista. https://www.eleconomista.com.mx/arteseideas/Presupuesto-para-ciencia-en-Mexico-muy-lejos-de-lo-que-la-ley-mandata-20190919-0023.html