Quality costs and world class quality tools for automotive suppliers: A bibliometric study

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/in22.43-469

Keywords:

quality costs, total quality management, world class quality, systematica literature review, Industry 4.0

Abstract

Surprisingly, not all organizations currently have a quality costs policy. Nonetheless, the prevention-appraisal-failure (PAF) model to manage quality costs is widespread in the modern industry. How this model relates to the appropriate use of world-class quality tools, following the 6-step structure of total quality management is to be present in available literature. This study proposed the use of a new way to correlate both via the TWCQM-COPAF matrix. To confirm this, a systematic literature review based on SALSA method and a simple Bibliometrix exercise, were used, not only confirming such relationships, but also concluding that world class quality tools under total quality management and the PAF model are appropriate for use in small and medium automotive suppliers and at the same time, quality gets closer to Industry 4.0 technologies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Juran (1951) , Feigenbaum (1956), Biadacz (2020), Plewa et al. (2016), Longenecker y Scazzero (1993), Zhang (2018), Bhardwaj y Belokar (2017), Farooq et al. (2017), Sousa y Nunes (2019), Rahardjo et al. (2020), Teplická y Hurná (2020), Matsoso y Benedict (2017), Niazi (2015), Grant y Booth (2009), Perevochtchikova et al. (2021), Longenecker y Scazzero (1993), Androniceanu (2017), Durairatnam et al. (2019), Sanchez et al. (2022), Fening y Boateng‐Okrah (2017), Anil y K.P. (2019), Mosadeghrad (2015), García-Alcaráz et al. (2019), Hwang et al. (2020), Alhih et al. (2020), Agyabeng-Mensah et al. (2021), Panuwatwanich y Nguyen (2017), Lee y Lee (2015), Dadi y Azene (2017), Brito et al. (2019), Goetz et al. (2015), Pambreni et al. (2019), Nasim (2018), Talapatra et al. (2018), García-Alcaraz et al. (2019), Kulenović et al. (2021), Erdil y Arani (2019), García-Bernal y Ramírez-Alesón (2015), Alhih et al. (2020), Prajogo y Cooper (2017), García-Alcaráz et al. (2019), Femi (2015), Pagare et al. (2019), Omar et al. (2019), Cepeda y Lopes (2019), Mallampati et al. (2018), Oliveira et al. (2017), Dadi y Azene (2017), Khan et al. (2019), Anil y K.P. (2019), Prajogo y Cooper (2017), Roman et al. (2017), Tortorella et al. (2021), Mosadeghrad (2015), Anil y K.P. (2019), Roman et al. (2017), Durairatnam et al. (2019), Kumar y Shanmuganathan (2019), Sánchez et al. (2022), Sinha et al. (2016), Coelho et al. (2022), Saleheen y Habib (2023), García-Fernánez et al. (2022), Singh et al. (2023), García y García (2019), Mahmoodi et al. (2022), De Giacomo et al. (2023), Laouenan et al. (2022), Teplická y Hurná (2020), García-Fernández et al. (2022),Farooq et al. (2017), Stawiarska et al. (2021).

Published

2025-01-31

How to Cite

Santoyo Ortega, J. (2025). Quality costs and world class quality tools for automotive suppliers: A bibliometric study. Innovaciones De Negocios, 22(43). https://doi.org/10.29105/in22.43-469