Employee satisfaction in federal public service organizations: Case study CFE in Nuevo Leon
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn10.20-2Keywords:
Employee Atisfaction, Public Organization, Nuevo León, WorkAbstract
In the literature, studies on Employee Satisfaction at Work focus mainly on the motivations and attitudes of the individual in relation to the design of the workplace , the environment team and the adequacy of Employee Rank (or vice versa ) . It is conceivable that the factors affecting the Employee Satisfaction at Work will differ depending on the type of organization and the conditions of their current organizational model. The purpose of this study is to identify whether the level of satisfaction of employees of a Federal Public Service Agency , changes according to gender (male or female) , their occupation ( or field office ) or geographical area found in the state of Nuevo León. Statistical Model for Process Management is used in organizations focused on improving Employee Satisfaction at Work factors as knowledge of Enterprise, Training Plan Life and Career, Leadership Services, Salaries, and Performance Evaluation. The main results show that the level of satisfaction of employees working on a federal agency in Nuevo Leon public services has improved , which is equal between men and women and between field and office staff , just change statistically areas where are laboring.
Downloads
References
Abbott, J. B. (2000). An investigation of the relationships between job characteristics, satisfaction, and team commitment as influenced by organization-based self-esteem within a team-based environment. Doctoral dissertation, University of North Texas,
. Dissertations Abstracts International, UMI 9992638.
Adam, E. E. (1991). Quality Circle Performance. Journal of Management, 17(1), 25-39.
Anderson, P., & Pulich, M. (2000). Retaining good employees in tough times. The Health Care Manager, 19(1), 50-8.
Batt, R., & Appelbaum, E. (1995). Worker Participation in Diverse Settings: Does the Form Affect the Outcome, and If So, Who Benefits?. British Journal of Industrial Relations, 33(3), 353-378.
Betcherman, G., McMullen, K. E., Davidman, K., & Canadian Policy Research Networks. (1998). Training for the new economy: A synthesis report. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks.
Blum, M. L., & Naylor, J. C. (1990). Psicología industrial: Sus fundamentos teóricos y sociales. México, D.F: Trillas.
Bridges, W. (1994). JobShift: How to prosper in a workplace without jobs. Reading, Mass: Addison-Wesley.
Byars, L. L., & Rue, L. W. (2004). Human resource management. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
Campion, M. A., Medsker, G. J., & Higgs, A. C. (1993). Relations between work group characteristics and effectiveness: Implications for designing effective work groups.
West Lafayette, Ind: Purdue University, Krannert Graduate School of Management.
Carrell, M. R., Kuzmits, F. E., & Elbert, N. F. (1989). Personnel: Human resource management. Columbus: Merrill Pub. Co.
Cordery (J.), Mueller (W.) & Smith (L.) (1991). Attitudinal and behavioural effects of autonomous group working: A longitudinal field study. Academy Management Journal, 34(2), 464-476.
Dammen, K. J. (2001). The effects of organizational structure on employee trust and job satisfaction. Master’s thesis University of Wisconsin Stout. Networked Digital Library of Theses and Dissertations.
Dessler, G., & Dessler, G. (1999). Essentials of management. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Driscoll, J. (1978). Trust and participation in decision - making as predictors of satisfaction. Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 44-56.
Erlick, K. (2002). Case study: Comparison of motivation for achieving higher performance between self-directed and manager-directed aerospace engineering teams. Ann Arbor, MI: ProQuest Information and Learning Co.
Eskildsen, J. K. & Dahlgaard, J. (2000). A causal model for employee satisfaction. Total Quality Management, 11(8), 1081-1094.
Fosam, E. B., Grimsley, M. F. J., & Wisher, S. J. (1998). Exploring models for employee satisfaction - with particular reference to a police force. Total Quality Management, 9(2), 235-248.
Fried, Y. & Ferris, G. R. (1991). The validity of the job characteristics model: a review and meta analysis. En Cary L. Cooper (Ed.) Industrial and Organizational Psycholog Vol. 2, Aldershot Hants: E. Elgar.
Gibson, I. D. (1996). Las organizaciones (8va ed.). México, D.F. McGraw- Hill Interamericana.
Glisson, C. & Durick, M. (1988). Predictors of job satisfactions and commitment in human service organizations. Administrative Science Quarterly, 33(1), 61-81.
Gordon, J. R., & Mascaró, S. P. (1997). Comportamiento organizacional. México: PrenticeHall Hispanoamericana.
Griffin (R.) (1988). Consequence of quality circle in an industrial setting: a longitudinal assessment, Academy Management Journal, 31(2), 338-358.
Hadden, R. (1997). Training Enhances Job Satisfaction. Jacksonville, FL: Contented Cows.
Hellriegel, D., Slocum, J. W., & Woodman, R. W. (1999). Comportamiento organizacional. México: International Thomson Editores.
Herzberg, F. (1966). Work and the nature of man. Cleveland: World Pub. Co.
Herzberg, F. (1959). The motivation to work. New York: Wiley
Katzell, R. A. & Yankelovich, D. (1975). Work, productivity, and job satisfaction: An evaluation of policy-related research. New York: Psychological Corp.
Kohn, A. (1993). Punished by rewards: The trouble with gold stars, incentive plans, A's, praise, and other bribes. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.
Kreitner, R. & Kinicki, A. (1997). Comportamiento de las organizaciones. Madrid: McGraw-Hill.
Iaffaldano, M. T. & Muchinsky, P. M. (January 01, 1985). Job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 97(2), 251-273.
Lambert, E. G., Lynne, H. N. & Barton, S. M. (June 01, 2001). The impact of job satisfaction on turnover intent: a test of a structural measurement model using a national sample of workers. The Social Science Journal, 38(2), 233-250.
Brown, B. L. & ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education. (1991). Worksite training. Columbus, Ohio: ERIC Clearinghouse on Adult, Career, and Vocational Education.
Mani, V. (2010). Development of employee satisfaction index scorecard.European Journal of Social Sciences, 15(1), 129-139.
Maslow, A. H. & Frager, R. (1987). Motivation and personality. New York: Harper and Row.
Mendenhall, W., Reinmuth, J. E., Díaz, S. J., OŔeilly, F. & Rincón, G. A. S. (1981).Estadística para administración y economía. México: Grupo Editorial Iberoamérica.
Michael, M. & Noreen, H. (1995). The high-performance organization: developing teamwork where it counts. Management Decision, 33(2), 56.
Owens, R. (1999). Organizational behavior in education. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.
Palomo M., Galindo P. & Cantú J. (2013). Procesos de Gestión para la Satisfacción del Empleado en el Trabajo, en las Organizaciones de Servicios (Pública o Federal, sin fin lucrativo). Memorias del Congreso de la ACACIA, Guadalajara, Jal.
Petty, M., McGee, G. M. & Cavender, J. W. (1984). A meta-analysis of the relationships between individual job satisfaction and individual performance. Academy of Management Journal, 9(4), 712-721.
Reyes, P. & Imber, M. (1992). Teachers' Perceptions of the Fairness of Their Workload and Their Commitment, Job Satisfaction, and Morale: Implications for Teacher
Evaluation. Journal of Personnel Evaluation in Education, 5(3), 291-302.
Robbins, S. P., & Fernández, M. A. S. (1999). Comportamiento organizacional. México [etc.: Prentice-Hall.
Schultz, D. P. (1985). Psicología industrial. México: McGraw-Hill.
Shockley-Zalabak, P., Ellis, K., & Winograd, G. (2000). Organizational trust: What it means, Why it matters. Organization Development Journal, 18, 35-48.
Sims, R. R. & Sims, S. J. (1989). American colleges and training for industry. Industrial & Commercial Training, 21(6) 3-9.
Spector, P. E., Vázquez, A. A., & Fernández, P. M. (2002). Psicología industrial y organizacional: Investigación y práctica. Mexico: Editorial El Manual Moderno.
Summers, G. (1978). Medicion de actitudes. México, D.F: Trillas.
Dean, T. & Jane, W. M. (1998). Managing employees in China from Hong Kong: interaction, relationships and productivity as antecedents to motivation. Leadership & Organization
Development Journal, 19(3), 147-156.
Wall, T. D., Kemp, N. J., Jackson, P. R. & Clegg, C. W. (1986). Outcome of autonomous workgroups: a long-term field experiment. Academy of Management Journal, 29(2),
-304.
Whaley, K. W. & Hegstrom, T. G. (1992). Perceptions of school principal communication effectiveness and teacher satisfaction on the job. Journal of Research and Development in Education, 25(4), 224-231.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2017 Innovaciones de Negocios
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
The InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs magazine is a free and open access electronic magazine of a scientific-academic nature and is a publication of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in which the authors retain their copyright and grant the magazine the exclusive right to first publication of the work. Third parties are allowed to use the published content, as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and the first publication in this journal is cited.
For more information, please contact the Research Secretary (FACPyA) of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Telephone: (81) 1340-4430. Email: revinnova@uanl.mx