Levels of quality in instruction from the perspective of student satisfaction: A study of mixed method research

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn8.16-5

Keywords:

Instruction, Moodle Platform, Online Course, Quality Education, Student´S Satisfaction

Abstract

The following research analyzes the levels of instructional design using DPIPE (Design, Production, Implementation, Publication & Evaluation). The platform applied is Moodle on the online course called “Competencias Globales”. The mix methodology in this study shows the level of satisfaction from students according to surveys, semi-structured interviews and online discussion groups conducted. Results and analysis from quantitative and qualitative data are presented as well as implication for further research projects suggested.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Feuer, M., Towne, L. & Shavelson, R. (2002). Scientific culture and educational research. Educational researcher, 31. 8, 4-14.

Giroux, S. y Tremblay G. (2009). Metodología de las Ciencias Humanas. Fondo de Cultura Económica. México: D.F

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista L. (2006). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill.

Hernández, R., Fernández, C., & Baptista L. (2010). Metodología de la investigación. México: McGraw Hill.

Lim, DooHun, Morris, M. & Kupritz, V. (s/f) Online vs. Blended Learning: references in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Recuperado el 16 de abril de la base de datos ERIC.

Mertens, D. (2005). Research and evaluation in Education and Psychology: Integrating diversity with quantitative, qualitative, and mixed methods. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Mingers, J. & Gill, A. (1997). Multimethodology: The theory and practice of combining Management Science methodologies. Winchester,: Wiley.

Miratía, O. & López, M. (2005). Estrategia de Cursos en Línea DPIPE. Recuperado el 15 de Abril de 2011, de: http://www.scribd.com/doc/32908590/Estrategia-de-Diseno-de-

Cursos-en-Linea-DPIPE

Morse, J. (2002). Principles of mixed and multi-method research design. En A.Thashakkori y C. Teddlie. Handbook of mixed methods in social and behavioral research (pp. 189–208). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Todd, Z. Nerlich, B. & McKeown, S. (2004). Introduction. En Z, Todd, B. Nerlich, S. McKeown y D. Clarke(Eds.). Mixing Methods in Psychology (pp 3-16). Hove: Psychology Press.

UDEM (2009). Informe Annual, Universidad de Monterrey. Consultado el 05 de Mayo del 2011 de: http://www.udem.edu.mx/acerca/masacerca/informe_anual_2009/3020

Downloads

Published

2011-07-22

How to Cite

Kutugata Estrada, A., Tamez Herrera, C., Barragán Codina, J. N., & Pérez Gorostieta, L. M. (2011). Levels of quality in instruction from the perspective of student satisfaction: A study of mixed method research. Innovaciones De Negocios, 8(16), 295–333. https://doi.org/10.29105/rinn8.16-5

Issue

Vol. 8 No. 16 (2011): Julio-Diciembre, 8(16)

Section

Artículos

License

Copyright (c) 2017 Innovaciones de Negocios

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

The InnOvaciOnes de NegOciOs magazine is a free and open access electronic magazine of a scientific-academic nature and is a publication of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León, in which the authors retain their copyright and grant the magazine the exclusive right to first publication of the work. Third parties are allowed to use the published content, as long as the authorship of the work is acknowledged and the first publication in this journal is cited.

For more information, please contact the Research Secretary (FACPyA) of the Autonomous University of Nuevo León. Telephone: (81) 1340-4430. Email: revinnova@uanl.mx
Crossref
Scopus
Google Scholar
Europe PMC